An everyday example of learning to learn is changing how you study after noticing your current approach isn’t sticking. Say you’re trying to learn Excel formulas. At first, you watch a long tutorial and take messy notes, but you still can’t build a spreadsheet without rewatching the video. Instead of “trying harder,” you adjust the way you learn: you break the skill into a few formula families (SUM/IF/XLOOKUP), practice each one with short exercises, and use quick self-tests to confirm you can do it from memory.
On day one, you write down every step from a tutorial. On day two, you reopen your notes and realize you’re copying rather than understanding. Learning to learn kicks in when you redesign your process:
The “learning” isn’t just Excel—it’s the improved system you can reuse for anything: languages, coding, product training, or certifications. You’re building awareness of what works for you (practice, testing, spacing, feedback) and dropping what wastes time (passive rewatching, copying, and vague goals).
For a practical, step-by-step way to build this skill, see this guide to meta-learning and a 4-step system to study smarter.
Common indicators include planning how you’ll study, checking your understanding as you go, adjusting methods when results are weak, and being able to explain which strategies help you learn faster.
A widely used set is visual, auditory, reading/writing, and kinesthetic (often called VARK). Many PDFs also note that most people learn best with a mix rather than a single type.
Any lasting change in knowledge or skill based on experience is learning—for example, using feedback from mistakes to improve performance the next time you do the task.
Leave a comment